Bushnell Neo Golf GPS

They do not tell to pay $ $ $ for this small unit that does not work until out of the box, plug it in and then you have to cough up $ 40 to upgrade an "annual membership". You can download a GPS course unless you do this. The so-called "Free Membership" worthless. So you end up having to pay almost $ 200. Better off having bought a scope. This is like someone who sells razor blades and then when you want, not mentioned that would be additional. I suggest reading the fine print. . . but there was none.
  Rating: 1 / 5

The most important issue when selecting a golf GPS unit is the availability and accuracy of the course. Many units of the most advanced (and expensive) (eg, UPR-GPS Golf and Callaway Golf Caddy II iGolf GPS) require a much more detailed course data for you to benefit from the expenditure. I found that this level of data available for any of the courses we play regularly, so I decided to go for a simpler solution. The most important consideration is whether the next (and how easily) you can "map" your own points in a course. Not all, even the most expensive units are allowed, and although it is less likely that you have to do with these units, I can assure you that even the best map data occasionally be inaccurate or nonexistent. This can really reduce the value of a GPS unit in the courses you play often. I almost returned the Neo, because some shortcomings in this area – in particular, can not "eliminate" a point of habit if you provide to download your data. This is really a silly restriction. You can "cancel" an existing point in recording a different point, but why not allow a single elimination? One of the holes I had downloaded a "pre-programmed" measuring point for a stream that does not exist! Another annoyance is that, while providing the ability to define their own "names" (labels) for their usual spots, this should be done as part of the procedure for registration of where the field. Creating a label is a cumbersome process that simply takes too long, when actually playing a hole. It would be much easier if you can use your "default" label to make the initial allocation in the field and then edit the label back home after the round. In the end, I decided to keep the unit because it is mostly accurate (+ / – 5 meters), is very compact, but with a readable screen (even for us older people), is quick to set up and the battery is battery with a very good life. Especially if, I kept it because the price is very reasonable. My final comment is that you really need both a simple GPS unit like the Neo and a simple rangefinder to get the exact distance to the pin location. If the course has large greens, the location of pin "indicator" for the day is usually not precise enough for the final approach shot. Maybe someday someone will come up with a combination unit!
  Rating: 3 / 5

IGolf Neo and I had one when I broke, I had to order another. I selected the Bushnell and was very pleased to see that I do not have to move to another screen to see the front and back distance to the green. It is right that as you go in the hole. I'm very happy with it, and I like the variety of easy to load and plenty of golf courses. What's more – I have done price comparisons golf stores online deep discount to [. . . ] Website. None of the prices were reasonable for a new like Amazon. com. Who knows?
  Rating: 5 / 5

Easy to use, the instructions may be a little better. There was some difficulty inserting names and new points. Tool a very reasonable cost. After the first year, I wish you the manufacturer that allow you to purchase ala carte courses over another $ 34 fee
  Rating: 4 / 5

The Neo is small, easy to configure and use. It has worked well in 4 states, and is very accurate – Nothing fancy, just a good basic information on the distance. So far the battery life was excellent.
  Rating: 4 / 5